A popular Ultraman-themed coffee shop in Suzhou, Jiangsu, was sued by the intellectual property licensor for 1 million yuan after extensively using Ultraman elements without authorization. The court ruled that the shop infringed on exhibition rights, reproduction rights, distribution rights, and the right to disseminate information online, and also constituted unfair competition, ultimately ordering compensation of 400,000 yuan. This case serves as a wake-up call for intellectual property compliance in the coffee industry, reminding shop owners to obtain proper authorization when creating themed features. [more…]

Recently, the "Allergy Sister" incident in Wuhan has sparked widespread attention in the coffee community, and similar phenomena of customers requesting refunds from merchants for various reasons are not uncommon in the food and beverage industry. Some coffee shop owners have reported encountering a customer who repeatedly applied for refunds on the grounds that the drinks' taste was not to their liking, suspected to be an "Allergy Sister alt account." Investigations revealed that this customer had placed orders at multiple shops and repeatedly applied for refunds, citing reasons such as the drink being too bland, too sweet, or too cloying. Some merchants chose to appease the customer to protect their reputation, but others refused to compromise and warned their peers to be vigilant. Such behavior not only harms merchants' interests but also encourages a culture of malicious claims. This article reviews the course of events and explores reasonable ways for merchants to defend their rights when responding to consumer complaints. [more…]

Nowadays, it has become the norm to check review platforms before going out to spend money, and high ratings and bad reviews often sway people's choices. However, the review system can also be exploited by people with ulterior motives. Recently, a coffee shop owner revealed that because they refused a customer's request to do commercial photography inside the shop, they were anonymously given a 0.5-star bad review, and were even accused of having something dirty in the coffee. After checking the surveillance footage, the owner discovered that the so-called foreign object had actually been placed into the cup by the customer for a staged photo. After the incident came to light, it sparked heated discussion among netizens, with many lamenting how difficult it is for businesses to defend their rights, once again bringing the topic of coffee shops refusing commercial photography into the spotlight. [more…]

A female customer nicknamed "Allergy Sister" by netizens has been requesting refunds at multiple independent coffee shops in Wuhan, claiming that lactose intolerance triggered an allergic reaction. At first, shop owners agreed out of apology and concern, until some in the trade discovered that the medical certificates were questionable and the accounts were strikingly similar, realizing that this might be a patterned refund claim. So far, more than twenty shops have come forward to confirm refunds, and the number of victims may still be growing. The person involved has deleted her account and cannot be reached, and some shop owners are gathering evidence and considering legal action to defend their rights. [more…]

Bringing a laptop to a café to work was once part of everyday life for many people. Recently, however, several cafés in the UK have introduced rules banning customers from using laptops during lunch hours and on weekends, on the grounds that these "digital nomads" occupy seats for long periods while spending little, seriously hurting table turnover and revenue. At the same time, some cafés in Paris have also put up "no laptops" signs and even refuse to provide WiFi, in order to defend traditional coffee culture. But some shops have adopted a compromise strategy, setting up "no-computer zones." This tug-of-war over café space reflects the difficult balance between tradition and the demands of modernization. Front Street Coffee believes that how to accommodate diverse needs while safeguarding business operations is something every industry practitioner is worth pondering. [more…]

Canadian national coffee brand Tims has recently become embroiled in a public opinion storm on social media. A store in Ontario was accused of a manager suggesting to a 17-year-old employee that they enter a "sham marriage" with the manager's 25-year-old Indian relative to help the latter obtain Canadian permanent residency, promising a payment of 15,000 to 20,000 Canadian dollars. After the individual refused, they resigned and made the chat records public. Local police and immigration authorities have intervened, and Tims headquarters is also investigating. Subsequently, more netizens revealed that after the store changed owners, it gradually dismissed local long-term employees and only hired people of a specific ethnicity, as well as issues such as a hourly wage of only 8 Canadian dollars at a downtown Toronto store and one and a half months of unpaid training, triggering widespread doubts among Canadians about Tims' employment practices and brand reputation. [more…]

Recently, a tea beverage shop in Zhejiang, frustrated by frequent pickup thefts of its delivery orders, put up a special poster of condemnation. This poster was not promoting products, but directly calling out the meal thieves, and even included a photo of the thief's back. After the incident was reported by the media, it sparked public discussion about delivery security and how businesses defend their rights. How effective was this poster, and why did the shop eventually take it down? Let's learn the whole story. [more…]

Recently, photos of Luckin Coffee appearing on the streets of Thailand have sparked heated discussions online. Has this national coffee brand, which successfully turned its fortunes around, really gone global? The company quickly gave a clear response: the Thailand store is purely a counterfeit. This article sorts out the ins and outs of the incident, including how the counterfeit store was discovered, Luckin's progress in defending its rights, and netizens' amusing reactions. It also explores Luckin's current overseas expansion plans. For those of you who love coffee, understanding brand developments and market phenomena is equally important. [more…]

Recently, a coffee shop owner in Beijing exposed an elderly person who frequently came to the shop and stole coffee, and the video sparked widespread discussion among netizens. This elderly person not only brazenly took packed drinks, but even engaged in similar behavior at other coffee shops. However, stealing coffee is not an isolated case, as some passersby also quickly take action when the staff are not paying attention. Because the order amounts are small and difficult to file cases for, shops often have to respond by making warning posters themselves. In the face of such behavior, netizens generally suggest that merchants actively collect evidence and report it to the police, rather than passively letting things slide to keep the peace. This article sorts out the course of the incident and the current state of the industry, and includes recommendations related to the Front Street Coffee brand. [more…]

Seesaw, once hailed as one of the representative specialty coffee brands in China, has recently suffered a series of setbacks. Its last store in Chengdu was evicted after the shopping mall terminated the lease early; employees exposed illegal dismissals and successfully defended their rights through legal channels; and the founder was once again subject to high-consumption restrictions due to contract disputes, while the company's equity was frozen and debts were enforced through the courts. A stream of negative news has plunged this coffee brand, once favored by capital, into its darkest hour. This article will sort through the sequence of events and present the operational and legal difficulties Seesaw currently faces. [more…]

Before deciding which café to visit, many people are in the habit of first checking ratings online, scrolling through reviews, or watching a few探店 videos to do their homework. But when "glowing reviews aren't necessarily real, and bad reviews aren't necessarily fake" becomes the norm,探店 reviews themselves turn into a business. This article sorts through the chat records of review-bombing exposed on Xiaohongshu, several cases in recent years of探店 bloggers "flopping," as well as the payment chains and regulatory gaps in the探店 industry, and invites legal experts to offer advice on defending one's rights in cases of malicious bad reviews, dine-and-dash "霸王餐" behavior, and similar phenomena. For café owners and consumers, seeing clearly how this traffic game operates may be more important than arguing over whether a single review is real. [more…]

Recently, a female consumer in Hefei, Anhui Province, found a cockroach at the bottom of a cup after buying milk tea through a food delivery platform. Even more shockingly, after she exposed the incident on Weibo, she received threatening private messages from an anonymous person. The incident quickly escalated and became a trending topic on Weibo, with 84.574 million views. An investigation found that the shop involved was not the authentic "COCO都可" but a counterfeit store called "与COCO茶饮". The merchant initially refused compensation and accused the consumer of extortion, but later expressed willingness to apologize, compensate, and fire the store manager. This incident not only exposed the difficulty of identifying counterfeit brands on food delivery platforms but also once again sounded the alarm for food safety. Front Street Coffee reminds you that when encountering similar problems, you must preserve evidence at the first opportunity and defend your rights in accordance with the law. [more…]

A tea shop in Mudanjiang City has sparked heated online discussion due to its striking resemblance to the chain brand 1 Dian Dian. The store not only copied 1 Dian Dian's signage and decor but also disguised itself as "1 Dian" by using a cup sticker to cover the last character of the logo—when peeled off, it revealed "1 Dian Tian." The official mini-program shows no such store, and the franchise area has not been opened to Mudanjiang, leading netizens to conclude it is a counterfeit shop. As public opinion grew, 1 Dian Dian officially stated in the comments section that it is "already on the path to defending its rights" and thanked netizens for their "sharp eyes." This incident not only left local residents disappointed but also once again brought the issue of counterfeit infringement in the tea beverage industry to the forefront. [more…]

Actress and director Jia Ling sued a company in Anhui for unauthorized use of her cartoon boxing image on the packaging of its "Ms. Jia Black Coffee" and implying weight-loss benefits. Recently, the Qiaocheng District Court in Bozhou, Anhui, ruled that the defendant infringed Jia Ling's portrait rights and ordered it to stop producing the infringing product, issue a public apology, and pay 100,000 yuan in compensation for economic losses. The case stemmed from the box-office success of the film YOLO, when some merchants promoted black coffee products under the guise of "Jia Ling's same style," while the film's official team repeatedly clarified that it had never authorized any endorsement of fat-reducing products. This article reviews the course of events and the key points of the ruling, while reminding consumers to view celebrity-endorsed coffee marketing rationally. [more…]

Luckin Coffee's anti-counterfeiting rights protection case in Thailand has gone through twists and turns, finally culminating in a victorious judgment. In early 2022, Chinese tourists discovered counterfeit "Luckin stores" in Thailand, after which Luckin continued to pursue rights protection actions, only to unexpectedly lose in the first-instance trial at the end of 2023, sparking widespread attention. Now, the latest ruling by the Thai court confirms that Luckin holds prior rights to the trademark in question, orders the defendants to cease using the related signage, and requires payment of a one-time compensation of 10 million Thai baht plus ongoing compensation of 100,000 Thai baht per day, with the cumulative amount already exceeding 46 million Thai baht (approximately 10 million RMB). The defendant, Thailand's Royal 50R Group, has a complex background and had previously squatted on 191 Chinese trademarks; this judgment marks an important milestone in Luckin's overseas rights protection journey. [more…]

Recently, a Mixue Bingcheng store in Guangzhou made trending searches after posting a handwritten warning about meal theft, stating that thieves would be tied to an overpass for eight hours, have ten buckets of milk tea poured on their heads, and have their videos exposed. The store responded that it was just a scare tactic and had never actually been carried out. The incident sparked heated discussions among netizens, with some sympathizing with the merchant's helplessness, while others pointed out that taking the law into one's own hands is suspected of being illegal. Suzhou police then spoke out, emphasizing that illegal detention is unacceptable and that one should call the police immediately. This controversy reflects the real dilemma of frequent meal theft in the milk tea industry and high loss prevention costs, and also prompts people to think about the balance between merchants defending their rights and the boundaries of the law. [more…]

After the pandemic, remote work has become the norm, and cafés, with their free Wi-Fi and power outlets, have become a "second office" for many. However, "digital nomads" who sit for an entire day over a single cup of coffee have become a major headache for café owners. Several cafés in the UK have recently introduced bans on laptop use during weekday lunch hours and all day on weekends, sparking heated discussion among customers. Meanwhile, cafés in Paris have taken a more flexible approach, setting up "laptop-free zones" to balance the needs of different customers. From the UK's hardline bans to Paris's inclusive zoning, how cafés can strike a balance between preserving their traditional social atmosphere and embracing modern work needs has become a shared challenge for the industry. Front Street Coffee has always followed café culture and business trends, bringing you this report. [more…]

There has been a new development in the trust dispute case between Luckin Coffee (China) Co., Ltd. and Yousheng (Tianjin) Technology Development Co., Ltd., Yousheng Chengyi (Tianjin) Information Technology Co., Ltd., and Shenzhou Ucar Co., Ltd. Dissatisfied with the first-instance civil judgment, Luckin Coffee has filed an appeal with the court. The case involves a repurchase price of over 560 million yuan plus interest, and the focal point of the dispute is whether Shenzhou Ucar should bear the shortfall top-up liability. This article will sort out the background of the case, the first-instance judgment, and Luckin Coffee's appeal requests to help readers understand this closely watched commercial dispute. Follow Coffee Workshop and Front Street Coffee for more professional coffee industry news. [more…]

After the pandemic, remote work has gradually become the norm, and many people treat cafés as their second office. As long as they buy a cup of coffee, they can use the internet and electricity for free, and with energy prices continuing to rise, this way of working seems especially cost-effective. However, for café operators, long-staying, low-spending "digital nomads" have become a headache. Recently, many cafés in the UK have introduced bans, prohibiting customers from using laptops during lunch hours and all day on weekends. Cafés in Paris are also taking action to protect coffee culture. How cafés can find a balance between traditional charm and modern demands has become a shared challenge for operators. Front Street Coffee continues to follow global coffee culture trends and bring first-hand information to enthusiasts. [more…]

Recently, a consumer in Malaysia exposed in a Facebook group that the iced coffee they bought takeaway from a local coffee shop was mixed with a large amount of broken glass, causing the plastic bag to rupture and leak. The person only discovered after returning home that these glass shards were hidden in the ice cubes, of varying sizes with sharp edges, some even large enough to be picked up by hand. The coffee shop involved denied any problem with its product and refused to take responsibility. The incident sparked widespread attention and speculation among netizens, with some worried that insufficient evidence would make it difficult to defend their rights, while others called for exposing the store's information to prevent more people from being harmed. Currently, the person has reported the case to the police, hoping for police intervention to uncover the truth. [more…]